Colorectal and coloanal anastomoses

AUTHORS: ARTHUR WIJSMULLER (MD, PHD), JOËL LEROY (MD, FRCS)
CHIEF EDITOR: JACQUES MARESCAUX (MD, FACS, Hon FRCS, Hon FJSES, Hon FASA, Hon APSA) ASSOCIATE EDITORS: DIDIER MUTTER (MD, PhD, FACS), BERNARD DALLEMAGNE (MD)

Educational Objectives

To discuss the basic aspects
To describe the possible types of anastomotic techniques according to the type of disease
To discuss anastomotic-specific functional/surgical outcomes

Colorectal and coloanal anastomoses

Arthur Wijsmuller, MD, PhD
VUmc, Netherlands
Joël Leroy, MD, FRCS
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France
bulent kaya, TURKEY
2018-05-07 07:23
good lecture
Jose Baptista, PORTUGAL
2018-03-01 00:29
very nice lecture! thanks!
SIGIFREDO GARCIA MORA, MEXICO
2018-01-20 02:14
Excellent, thanks
Aleksandar Dzodan, SLOVENIA
2017-12-05 20:15
Thank you for excellent lecture
Osama Algohary, SAUDI ARABIA
2017-12-05 11:12
excellent. Thanks.
NATASHA LORIA, COSTA RICA
2017-11-29 03:38
Great!
giuseppe desantis, ITALY
2017-11-18 20:04
excellent
Mohamad Alosman, SAUDI ARABIA
2017-11-09 21:42
Great
osama esam, EGYPT
2017-11-06 19:34
very helpful
osama esam, EGYPT
2017-11-06 19:33
very helpful
Sahin Ugurlu, TURKEY
2017-10-27 17:28
Thank you for the excellent presantatiön
ıbıs ıbıs, TURKEY
2017-10-26 21:31
Thanks
önder altın, TURKEY
2017-10-12 11:35
Thanks
Naeem Qureshi, PAKISTAN
2017-09-30 11:12
very informative for emerging young surgeons
yousri ballah, ALGERIA
2017-09-10 08:12
very simple very usefull thanks
vinh chau, VIET NAM
2017-07-18 10:34
thank you!
saleh alqahtani, KOREA, REPUBLIC OF
2017-07-15 04:37
thanks
lakehal mohamed, FRANCE
2017-07-02 14:25
Thanks
Mikhail Agapov, RUSSIAN FEDERATION
2017-06-19 20:52
great presentation, thank you
Sérgio Galhardi, BRAZIL
2017-06-18 23:20
THANKS FOR THIS LESSON
Miguel Angel Aguirre, ARGENTINA
2017-05-21 23:48
Thanks!!!! Great presentation
Thang Ngo Viet, VIET NAM
2017-05-21 12:48
Perfect presentation. Very useful. Thanks!
martin chenu, PARAGUAY
2017-05-03 04:55
Very useful... Thanks!!!!
omer topuz, TURKEY
2017-04-18 12:52
this is the art of exellence in surgery. thanks
Ricardo Garcia, BRAZIL
2017-03-24 20:19
amazing
kazi Alam, BANGLADESH
2017-03-19 19:35
usefull lecture
Duong Trong Hien, VIET NAM
2017-03-17 03:49
usefulness presentation
Antonio Climent Aira, SPAIN
2017-03-08 19:45
Excelente revisión, muchas gracias
roberto bruni, ITALY
2017-03-07 18:39
Very interesting presentation
Juan Rachadell, PORTUGAL
2017-03-05 12:15
Excellent discussion! But I don´t understand the comparison between PME for high rectal cancer and TEM for low rectal cancer. The indications are different. I any case they would show that, as suspected, a lower anastomosis has a higher risk of complication.
LUIS GUILLERMO DENIS, MEXICO
2017-03-04 15:49
EXCELENTE PRESENTACION.
FELICIDADES.
Guy Vijgen, NETHERLANDS
2017-02-21 17:35
Mooi Arthur!
lica ion, ROMANIA
2017-02-13 19:39
very goog review indeed !
Jose Negron, PERU
2017-01-31 06:53
A good review, thank you.
Jose Andres Guzman Davila, VENEZUELA
2017-01-22 20:05
que grande que websurg haga esto... en los paises en desarrollo nos ilustramos mucho con ustedes y nuestros pacientes lo agradecen...
Thanchanok Th, THAILAND
2017-01-18 10:56
Thank you for good review
mehmet baki dogan, TURKEY
2017-01-07 20:11
thank you.
nabil nader, CANADA
2016-12-18 11:31
very good review principles Thanks
humberto benitez, MEXICO
2016-12-15 17:20
Excelente¡ Thanks a lot
ilir shani, ALBANIA
2016-12-14 14:42
very useful
ilir shani, ALBANIA
2016-12-14 14:40
thank you very good
George Skroubis, GREECE
2016-12-13 12:43
Very educational lectures and videos. I think that they will help junior laparoscopic surgeons to avoid mistakes and complications that senior ones have done and hopefully have learned not to do.
Nezar Almahfooz, IRAQ
2016-12-13 09:41
Useful educational activity

Vascularization and tension-free principle

İsmail Güler, TURKEY
2018-02-27 21:26
thanks
imtiyaz zaki, INDIA
2017-09-18 17:24
thanks
Samuel H Charles Medina, MEXICO
2017-07-20 23:25
Details, success in surgical techniques
ALEJANDRO BIANCO, ARGENTINA
2017-07-19 21:13
Thanks
quyet tran, VIET NAM
2017-06-21 13:03
I like...thanks!
Fernando Manso, PORTUGAL
2017-06-11 10:08
Obrigado
Fernando Manso, PORTUGAL
2017-06-11 10:08
Obrigado
Fernando Manso, PORTUGAL
2017-06-11 10:08
Obrigado
achraf redouane, MOROCCO
2017-04-01 23:35
thanks a lot
chinbat gombodorj, MONGOLIA
2017-02-14 17:24
A good review.thank you

anastomosis techniques

Ceyhun Badalov, RUSSIAN FEDERATION
2018-04-24 09:09
thank you very much
Abdulcabbar Kartal, TURKEY
2017-08-13 16:56
excellent
Laura Calderon, MEXICO
2017-04-11 02:46
bueno
Manuel Galarza, ARGENTINA
2017-01-26 03:56
excelent....
Daniel Cesar, BRAZIL
2016-12-24 18:41
Very educative

specific cases

Juan Rachadell, PORTUGAL
2017-03-17 13:48
An elegant solution.
Is what we see on 4:24 a ureteric anastomosis?
Guillermo Perez Chagerben, ECUADOR
2017-03-07 14:58
excelente alternativa
tihomir grgic, CROATIA
2017-01-09 22:41
educative and useful

Complications

Pranas Sniuolis, LITHUANIA
2017-07-02 19:04
I used this techinque

Exposure

junhong hu, CHINA
2018-01-16 14:58
verygood

References

  1. Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention. Polk ea. Surgery 1969; 66: 97-103
  2. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Clarke ea. Ann Surg 1977; 186: 251-259
  3. Effect of preoperative antibiotic regimen on development of infection after intestinal surgery: prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Washington ea. Ann Surg 1974; 180: 567-572
  4. Comparison between systemic and oral antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Keighley ea. Lancet 1979;1:894–897
  5. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Guenaga ea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1
  6. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Guenaga ea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 9
  7. Oral Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dahabreh IJ1, Steele DW, Shah N, Trikalinos TA.
  8. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Nelson RL1, Glenny AM, Song F.
  9. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Nelson RL1, Gladman E, Barbateskovic M.
  10. Comparing Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Both Oral and Systemic Antibiotics Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Systemic Antibiotics Alone for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Chen ea. Dis Col Rect 2016; 59; 1: 70-78
  11. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Kiran ea. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 3: 416-425
  12. Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces incisional surgical site infection and anastomotic leak rates after elective colorectal resection. Scarborough ea. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 2: 331-337
  13. Nationwide analysis of outcomes of bowel preparation in colon surgery. Moghadamyeghaneh ea. JACS 2015; 220: 5: 912-920
  14. Oral antibiotic bowel preparation significantly reduces surgical site infection rates and readmission rates in elective colorectal surgery. Morris ea. Ann Surg 2015. 261: 6: 1034-1040
  15. Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation. Bretagnol ea. Ann Surg 2010; 252;5: 863-868
  16. Oral and parenteral vs parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparosopic colorectal surgery. Hata ea. Ann Surg 2016; 263; 6: 1085-1091
  17. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection? Monson ea. Dis Col Rec 2012; 55;11: 1195-1197
  18. Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Brennan ea. Dis Col Rec 2007: 50; 3: 302-307
  19. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Parks. 1972. Proc R Soc Med: 975-976
  20. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Knight ea. Surgery 1980; 88: 710
  21. Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis; description of technique. Baker. Arcch Surg 1950; 61: 143-157
  22. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Lazorthes ea. BJS 1986; 73: 136-138
  23. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Parc ea. BJS 1986; 73: 139-141
  24. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision. Law ea. Ann Surg 2004; 240; 2: 260-268
  25. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Emmertsen ea. BJS 2013; 100: 1377-1387
  26. The intramural spread of rectal carcinoma. Cole. Br Med J 1913; i: 431-433
  27. Distal intramural spread of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Grinnell. Surg Gyn Obstet 1954; 99; 4: 421-30
  28. Reappraisal of the 5 cm rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Willams ea. BJS 1983; 70: 150-154
  29. ’Close shave’ in anterior resection. Karanjia ea. BJS 1990;77: 510-512
  30. Altering the therapeutic paradigm towards a distal bowel margin of
  31. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision. Law ea. Ann Surg 2004; 240; 2: 260-268
  32. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Emmertsen ea. BJS 2013; 100: 1377-1387B39
  33. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Emmertsen ea. Ann Surg 2012; 225: 5: 922-928
  34. Meta-analysis of reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Huttner ea. BJS 2015;102: 735-745
  35. Four anastomotic techniques following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Penna ea. Tech Colo 2015; 20; 3: 185-91
  36. Functional assessment of colorectal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the anal transition zone. Leroy ea. Dis Col Rect 1991
  37. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Chamlou ea. Ann Surg. 2007; 246; 6: 916-922
  38. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Martin ea. BJS. 2012; 99; 603-612
  39. Outcomes following Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Remzi ea. BJS 2009;96: 424-429
  40. The clinical results of the Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis, a systematic review. Hallet ea. Tech Coloproct 2014; 18: 579-590
  41. Outcomes following Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Remzi ea. BJS 2009;96: 424-429
  42. Bowel endometriosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Obst Gyn Surv Surv 207; 62, 7: 461-470
  43. Laparoscopic resection with transanal specimen extraction for sigmoid diverticulitis. Leroy ea. BJS 2011; 98: 1327-1334
  44. Totally laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) technique, particulalry suitable for bowel endometriosis. JMIG 2014; 21, 6: 1096-1102
  45. Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for endometriosis with transanal specimen extraction. JMIG 2013; 20; 4: 412
  46. Totally laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) techniques. J Gyn 2014; 21, 6: 1095-1102
  47. Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. Constantino ea. Surg Endosc 2012; 26, 6: 1495-500
  48. How do patients score cosmesis after laparosopic natural orifice specimen extraction colectomy? Wolthuis ea. Colorectal Disease 2014; 17: 536-541
  49. Exfoliated cells and in vitro growth in colorectal cancer. Skipper ea. BJS 1987; 74; 11: 1049-1052
  50. Benefit of rectal washout for anterior resection and left sided resections. Int J Surg 2016. Siddiqi ea. 25: 106-108
  51. Systematic review and meta-analysis of rectal washout on risk of local recurrence for cancer. Zhou ea. J Surg Res 2014; 189; 1: 7-17
  52. Rectal washout and local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection. Kodeda ea. BJS 2010; 97: 1589-1597
  53. Anastomotic leak testing after colorectal resection: what are the data? Ricciardi ea. Arch Surg. 2009;144:407–411. discussion 411–412
  54. Relationship between multiple nubers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Ito ea. Int J Col Dis 2008; 23; 7: 703-707
  55. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Kawade ea. Surg Endo 2014; 28: 2988-2995
  56. Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Katsuno ea. Surg Endo 2016; 30: 2848-2856
  57. Does Administration of Antibiotics in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Result in Less Complications and Better Prognosis?
  58. MECCLAND
  59. Benefit of rectal washout for anterior resection and left sided resections. Int J Surg 2016. Siddiqi ea. 25: 106-108